Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jayant Warping Works Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16 to 2020-2021
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Jayant Warping Works Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Section 68 Addition Deleted in Search Case – No Incriminating Material “Dumb Documents” Rejected Mumbai ITAT delivered a detailed ruling deleting additions made u/s 68 and 69C in search assessments, holding that in absence of incriminating material, no addition can be sustained in unabated assessments. On unsecured loans (₹50 lakh u/s 68): Assessee furnished complete documentary evidence: PAN, ITR, financials, confirmations, bank statements AO relied on: Investigation Wing reports (Kolkata) Third-party statements (later retracted) Tribu...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930