Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Anil Mohanlal Thakker Vs Assessing Officer (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-2015
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Anil Mohanlal Thakker Vs Assessing Officer (ITAT Mumbai) Full Section 54 Exemption Allowed – Pre-Purchase Payments Also Count Towards Investment Mumbai ITAT held that entire capital gains exemption u/s 54 cannot be denied merely because part of the investment was made prior to the one-year window before sale. The assessee sold a property on 06.09.2013 and earned LTCG of ₹52.84 lakh, claiming full exemption on purchase of a new residential flat costing ₹1.93 crore. The AO restricted exemption only to ₹32.97 lakh, considering only payments made within one year prior to transfer. The Trib...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930