Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ramesh Kumar Puraji Jain Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Ramesh Kumar Puraji Jain Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Mumbai ITAT deleted additions made u/s 69 towards alleged on-money payment in cash for purchase of a shop in the Platinum Mall project (Rubberwala Group search cases). The Tribunal held that: The entire addition was based on a pen drive (Excel sheets) seized from a third party and statements of builder’s employees, without any direct evidence against the assessee No cash receipt, voucher, ledger, or incriminating document linking the assessee to cash payment was found The assessee had paid full consideration through banking channels, even highe...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 153C Proceedings Invalid Where Deemed Search Date Is After 1-4-2021: ITAT Bangalore Selling & Marketing Expenses Cannot Be Disallowed Due to Ledger Nomenclature Error: ITAT Bangalore Executive Search Fees Not Taxable as FTS or Royalty Under India–Netherlands DTAA: ITAT Mumbai No TDS on Reimbursement of Common Legal Expenses: ITAT Mumbai BSNL VRS Employees Eligible for Full Exemption of Retrenchment Compensation & Leave Encashment: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031