Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ramesh Kumar Puraji Jain Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ramesh Kumar Puraji Jain Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Mumbai ITAT deleted additions made u/s 69 towards alleged on-money payment in cash for purchase of a shop in the Platinum Mall project (Rubberwala Group search cases). The Tribunal held that: The entire addition was based on a pen drive (Excel sheets) seized from a third party and statements of builder’s employees, without any direct evidence against the assessee No cash receipt, voucher, ledger, or incriminating document linking the assessee to cash payment was found The assessee had paid full consideration through banking channels, even highe...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930