The ITAT Mumbai, in Mohan Thakurdas Gurnani Vs ITO, deleted penalties levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for notional income from house property, holding that penalty requires actual concealment, not notional additions.
An NBFC’s claim for on an irrecoverable loan was allowed by the ITAT, which overturned the disallowance. The court ruled that non-recovery of a business loan differs from a loan waiver, qualifying the amount as a business loss or bad deb
The tribunal ruled that stating “for objects of the trust” in Form 10 is sufficient if supported by a Board Resolution specifying use for scholarships. Disallowance by CIT(A) was set aside, highlighting substance over form in charitable trusts.
ITAT Mumbai rules Section 205 protects taxpayers. TDS credit cannot be denied due to Form 26AS mismatch caused by deductor’s default or non-deposit.
ITAT quashes PCIT’s Sec 263 order; rules AO made detailed inquiry into unsecured loans, rejecting PCIT’s view that inadequacy of inquiry justifies revision.
ITAT Mumbai holds TDS credit follows income, not PAN. Credit cannot be denied due to Form 26AS mismatch if income is taxed in assessee’s hands.
ITAT quashes Rs..4.52 Cr disallowance; rules foreign agent commission and warehousing charges aren’t taxable FTS in India, thus no TDS under Section 195 required.
Anuh Pharma Ltd. Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai) CSR Deduction u/s 80G Disputed -Cooling Tower is Not Automatically Power – ITAT Mumbai Endorses 263 Revision-Lack of Proper Inquiry Fatal – ITAT Confirms PCIT Action Against AO’s Order; ITAT Mumbai upheld revisionary order u/s 263 against assessee, holding that AO failed to conduct proper inquiry into two […]
Mumbai ITAT quashes ₹1.76 Cr unexplained investment tax on NRI homemaker, ruling joint registration doesn’t justify addition when funds came solely from husband.
ITAT Mumbai allows Nikhil Manjrekar’s Sec 54 claim, directing deletion of LTCG disallowance; substantive proof of property reinvestment sufficed despite technical objection.
