Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Professional Artist Cosmetics LLP Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Professional Artist Cosmetics LLP Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai) High Interest Paid to Lenders a Commercial Decision, Not Ground for Section 263 Action- Once AO Inquired Applied Mind, Revision u/s 263 Not Permissible- PCIT Cannot Revise Just for Different Opinion The appeal by Professional Artist Cosmetics LLP challenged revisionary order u/s 263 passed by PCIT, whereby assessment u/s 143(3) dated 02.12.2022 was set aside for re-verification of unsecured loans & interest payments. Assessee, engaged in manufacture & trading of cosmetics, had filed ROI declaring ₹89.90 lakh. AO conducted detail...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930