Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Poornima Sanjay Prabhu Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : :2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Poornima Sanjay Prabhu Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai Deletes Rs.1.76 Cr Addition – Joint Name in Sale Deed Irrelevant Without Contribution- Mere Joint Registration Not Proof of Investment ITAT Mumbai deleted addition of Rs.1,76,16,200/- made u/s 69 towards alleged unexplained investment in a flat jointly purchased with husband. Tribunal held that assessee, an NRI homemaker with no income, had not contributed any funds & mere inclusion of her name in sale agreement could not justify taxing her The assessee, residing in UAE with her husband for over two decades, was a non-resident for A...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Pune ITAT: Housing Society Wins U/s 80P Deduction on Interest from Cooperative Banks No Double Taxation on Liability Write-Back: Delhi ITAT Deletes Section 41(1) Addition and Notional Interest Demand Copy-Paste Reasons Sink Reassessment: Delhi ITAT Quashes Reopening for Non-Application of Mind No 14A Disallowance Without Satisfaction, No Penalty on Debatable Issues Section 54 Relief Cannot Be Denied If Capital Gains Are Invested Before Filing Return u/s 139(4): Bangalore ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930