This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Delhi HC expresses concerns regarding proposed definition of jewellery u/r 2(viii) of Baggage Rules
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Qamar Jahan Vs Union of India (Delhi High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Qamar Jahan Vs Union of India (Delhi High Court)
Delhi High Court has expressed some concerns in respect of the definition of the ‘jewellery’ in proposed Rule 2(viii) of the Baggage Rules as also the monetary cap being retained, albeit with modification, under proposed Rule 5 of the said Rules.
Facts- This is an application seeking clarification of order dated 19th May, 2025 and release of two gold kadas and one gold of the Petitioner which were seized by the Customs Authority. The present petition had been filed challenging the impugned Order-in-Original dated 6th Februar...
Author Info
