Delhi High Court rules in case of in Fayiz Nangaparambil Vs Union of India & Anr, emphasizing the importance of specific allegations in a Show Cause Notice for GST registration suspension.
Detailed look into Delhi High Court’s ruling in Om Parkash Vs ITO case regarding taxation on agricultural land sale without adjusting cost of acquisition
Delhi HC in Victorious H Grand Vs PCIT, instructs Income Tax Department to dispose of revision application under Section 264 of I-T Act within eight-week timeframe.
Delhi High Court mandates reassessment in Praveen Bansal vs ITO, emphasizing fair hearing and verification of claims under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act.
Delhi HC in Merlin Facilities Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India, held that impugned order of provisional attachment of bank accounts under CGST Act becomes non-operative post statutory period of one year.
Delhi High Court quashes the penalty order issued under Black Money Act, citing the department’s failure to consider assessee’s email.
Delhi High Court orders reevaluation in Upinder Kumar Wanchoo vs ITO, stressing fair hearing and document review under Sections 148A(b) and 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act.
Delhi High Court held that department cannot ignore an order passed by the appellate authority merely stating that it proposes to file an appeal against the said order.
Delhi High Court held that order passed under section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act without dealing with the request for accommodation and according without hearing the petitioner is in violation of principles of nature justice and hence liable to be set aside.
Delhi High Court held that the award can be regarded as enforceable only if it is actually executable. Accordingly, the Final Partial Award passed by the Arbitral Tribunal is unenforceable award.
