Delhi HC Quashes Order u/s 148A(d) for not considering reply of appellant

Upinder Kumar Wanchoo Vs ITO (Delhi High Court)

In this writ petition, the petitioner, Upinder Kumar Wanchoo, contested a notice and subsequent order issued under Section 148A(b) and Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, respectively. The petitioner claimed that the Assessing Officer did not fully consider the reply provided to the initial notice.

Wanchoo’s main argument stemmed from his former partnership in a firm named Forde International, which was later dissolved and converted into a sole proprietorship. T

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.