This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Delhi HC Quashes Order u/s 148A(d) for not considering reply of appellant
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Upinder Kumar Wanchoo Vs ITO (Delhi High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Upinder Kumar Wanchoo Vs ITO (Delhi High Court)
In this writ petition, the petitioner, Upinder Kumar Wanchoo, contested a notice and subsequent order issued under Section 148A(b) and Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, respectively. The petitioner claimed that the Assessing Officer did not fully consider the reply provided to the initial notice.
Wanchoo’s main argument stemmed from his former partnership in a firm named Forde International, which was later dissolved and converted into a sole proprietorship. The petitioner argued that all the necessary documentation supporting this cha...
