PCIT Vs Karuna Garg (Delhi High Court) PCIT states that ITAT has erred in deleting the additions on account of bogus Long-Term Capital Gain on sale of penny stock company namely M/s Goldline International Finvest Ltd. on the ground that the assessing officer has not made independent enquiry. ITAT held that In the absence of […]
Dr B L Kapur Memorial Hospital Vs CIT (TDS) (Delhi High Court) HC Court is of the view that the requirement of payment of twenty per cent of disputed tax demand is not a pre-requisite for putting in abeyance recovery of demand pending first appeal in all cases. The said pre-condition of deposit of twenty […]
Rajesh Katyal Vs Income Tax Department (Delhi High Court) Supreme Court in judgment of Ganpati Dealcom Pvt. Ltd. Held that offence under Section 53 of Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016 is prospective and would only apply to those transactions which were entered into after amendment came into force i.e., 01st November, 2016. Supreme has […]
RMSI Private Limited Vs National Faceless Assessment Centre (Delhi High Court) Since in the present case, the impugned order has been passing without issuing a show cause notice / a draft assessment order which has been mandated under Section 144B(1)(xvi)(b) of the Act, the impugned assessment order dated 8th September, 2021 issued under Section 143(3) read […]
ITAT has erred in holding that the entire payments received by the Assessee from its Indian Customers on account of Centralized Services viz. sales and marketing, loyalty programs, reservation service, technological service, operational services and training programs/human resources do not constitute ‘Fee for Technical Services’ as defined under Section 9(l)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the ‘Act’) or ‘Fee for included services’ as defined under Articles 12(4) (a) of the Indo-US DTAA.
HC held that Preventive Detention Under Section 3 of Cofeposa Act Is Not Sustainable If Legible And Translated Copies of Ruds Not Been Supplied to Detenue
HC held that, payment of tax made during the conduct of search cannot be considered as voluntary payment of tax. Further directed the Revenue Department to refund the amount deposited by the assessee along with the interest.
Delhi High Court held that once it is clear that C form were issued by the registered dealer holding valid registration certificate in respect of goods sold by selling dealer. Benefit of the same cannot be denied to selling dealer.
Delhi High Court held that as per Article 7(1) of DTAA attribution of profits to Permanent Establishment arises only if foreign enterprise is making a profit. The same is not applicable if foreign enterprise is making a loss.
Delhi High Court held that circular/ instruction no. 5051 dated 07.02.1991 states that prosecution normally be not initiated against a person who has attained the age of 70 years at the time of commission of offence. However, petitioner cannot be permitted to take benefit of Circular/ Instruction No. 5051 dated 07.02.1991 to find an escape route for the wrong committed by him.
