Delhi High Court held that the power to grant bail on medical grounds under the first proviso to Section 45(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) is discretionary. Accordingly, court directed AIIMS to evaluate medical condition of the petitioner.
Delhi High Court granted interim bail on petitioner satisfying the test of proviso to section 45(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) as petitioner is suffering from life-threatening diseases warranting immediate medical attention.
Delhi High Court quashes IT order under Section 148A(d) against Krishna Diagnostic, highlighting errors in property transaction allegations.
Delhi High Court held that interim protection granted as applicant is not named in ECIR and also the applicant is not implicated in any of the Scheduled Offences under Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA).
Delhi High Court held that notice u/s 148 and order thereon issued and passed against a non-extant entity cannot be complied with and hence liable to be set aside.
Delhi High Courts in Sesame Workshop Initiatives (India) Pvt Ltd vs Union of India held that interest should be allowed due to inordinate delay in refunding GST amount to petitioner, setting a precedent for similar cases in future.
Delhi HC In Shri Chhatter Pal & Ors. issued guidelines for mediators while drafting Settlement Agreements in cases of matrimonial disputes.
Discover the recent ruling by the Delhi High Court quashing time-barred reassessment proceedings for escaped income below the mandatory monetary threshold.
Delhi High Court held that rule 89(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 applies only in case of zero rated supply of goods or services, without payment of tax under bond or letter of undertaking. Accordingly, provisions are inapplicable to cases of refund of integrated tax paid on zero rated supply.
High Court held that the Order of Appellate Authority allowing refund to assessee cannot be ignored solely because Revenue decided to challenge the order allowing refund, directed the Revenue to disburse refund along with interest and clarified that Revenue is not precluded from availing any remedy and in case Revenue succeeds they would be entitled to recovery the amount disbursed.
