Bai Mamubai Trust Vs Suchitra (Bombay High Court) In the present case, where the Plaintiff has made out a strong prima facie case and the Defendant has not been able to demonstrate any semblance of right to occupy the Suit Premises, it cannot be said that the Defendant’s occupation pursuant to an Order of the […]...

Mr. Ashok Kumar Vs Commissioner CGST & Central Excise (Bombay High Court) Taking into consideration, the facts of the case, though the officers under the CGST Act, cannot seek custody of the arrested persons for completing the investigation, respondent’s contention that applicant’s detention in custody is necessary to prevent him ...

whether depreciation is mandatory to be granted while determining the Appellant's entitlement to the deduction under Section 80IB of the Act, even though the Appellant had not claimed such depreciation?...

Kangana Ranaut Vs. Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai & Ors. (Bombay High Court) Section 354A of the Act (which is invoked by the MCGM by issuing the impugned Notice dated 7th September, 2020), sets out the ‘power of Commissioner to stop erection of building or work commenced or carried on unlawfully.’ From the works set ...

On 3rd September 2020, the Bombay High Court has passed a landmark ruling placing the wife in a position as a Guardian for her comatose (in the position of coma).  The Bombay High Court thereby affirmed that a spouse could be the best Guardian for his/her spouse and thus, appointed the spouse of a comatose man as his guardian for...

Tribunal in a detailed discussion contained in judgment, had rejected the contention of Revenue. Tribunal had taken into account the valuation of the existing machinery used at Daman and the valuation of the written down value of machinery transferred from Aurangabad to come to the conclusion that same did not exceed 20% of the total valu...

This office is conscious of the procedure required to be followed by it to recover and will initiate the recovery proceeding with issuance of show cause notice, working of interest calculation and further actions as per provision of law. There is no intention of this office to directly recover interest under Section 50 of the CGST / MGST ...

Sumit Balkrishna Gupta Vs ACIT (Bombay High Court) The issue under consideration is whether the issuing of a notice u/s 143(2) in the name of the wrong person is sustainable in law? High Court states that it is a fact that the petitioner had filed return for the assessment year 2016-17 in the name of […]...

The issue under consideration is Whether compensation paid to earlier buyer to cancel the agreement is deductible expenditure u/s 48 for calculation of Capital Gains?...

Gateway Leasing Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (Bombay High Court) The issue under consideration is whether the re-opening of the assessment u/s 147 is justified in law? In the present case, after referring to the information received following search and seizure action carried out in the premises of Shri Naresh Jain, it was stated that information [&...