Excise Duty Act, Rules Articles News Notification Circulars Instructions. Input Credit, Cenvat, Duty Rate, SSI Exemption, Excise on Jewellery,Excise on Garment
Excise Duty : India reduced excise duty on petrol and diesel to offset rising global crude prices due to geopolitical tensions. The move aimed t...
Excise Duty : Health Security & National Security (HSNS) Cess Act, 2025 introduces a standalone statutory cess aimed at funding national health ...
Excise Duty : The Court upheld the Tribunal’s view that interest cannot be levied when duty paid is fully creditable to downstream units. It c...
Excise Duty : The Court held that duty-paid items supplied directly to site are not includible when the final plant is immovable. The key takeaw...
Excise Duty : Discover how the Central Excise (Amendment) Act, 2025 revamps tobacco taxation, introducing steep excise duties on cigarettes, che...
Excise Duty : CBI Court in Siliguri sentences former Central Excise Superintendent to four years RI and Rs. 40,000 fine in a bribery case regist...
Excise Duty : A special court imposed five years’ rigorous imprisonment and heavy fines after finding assets far beyond known income. The ruli...
Excise Duty : The FAQs confirm that cess is computed on maximum rated machine speed rather than actual production. This ensures certainty in tax...
Excise Duty : The FAQs clarify how excise duty on chewing tobacco, jarda, and gutkha will be levied based on packing machine capacity rather tha...
Excise Duty : CESTAT issues instructions for e-filing appeals, detailing registration, filing process, documents, fees, and compliance with Proc...
Excise Duty : CESTAT Mumbai held that Rule 16(2) of the Central Excise Rules does not mandate that remanufactured goods be supplied back to the ...
Excise Duty : CESTAT Delhi held that works contract services used for repair and maintenance of existing plant and machinery qualify as input se...
Excise Duty : CESTAT Chennai held that exports made under Notification No. 30/2004-CE and the DEPB scheme cannot be included in exempted turnove...
Excise Duty : The Tribunal held that the show cause notice issued more than three years after the Department became aware of the facts was time-...
Excise Duty : CESTAT held that where the value of goods sent for job work had already been considered for credit reversal purposes, including it...
Excise Duty : The Lakshadweep Excise Regulation, 2026 establishes a comprehensive framework for licensing, manufacture, sale, transport, and con...
Excise Duty : Notification No. 25/2026 revises SAED on ATF exports to Rs 9.5 per litre with effect from 1 June 2026; domestic petrol and diesel ...
Excise Duty : Notification No. 24/2026 revises SAED rates on petrol and diesel exports from 1 June 2026, setting duty at Rs 1.5 and Rs 13.5 per ...
Excise Duty : CBIC revised SAED on ATF exports to Rs. 16 per litre effective 16 May 2026, impacting aviation fuel exporters and export duty cost...
Excise Duty : The Ministry of Finance amended the central excise notification issued in March 2026 by revising rates applicable to specified goo...
Circular No.657/48/2002-CX I am directed to refer to Central Excise (Removal of Goods under Concessional Rate of Duty) Rules, 2001 and Board”s Circular No.617/8/2002-CX dated 6.2.2002 relating to movement of goods outside the factory
Circular No.656/47/2002-CX.8 I am directed to say that certain instances have been brought to the notice of the Board wherein refund amount originally credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund is subsequently to be paid to the assessee on account of orders of appellate judicial authorities. However, as reported the drawl of amount originally credited to Consumer Welfare Fund usually takes time due to involvement of various agencies resulting in delay in grant of refund to the assessee and the Department has to pay interest on such delayed refunds.
in para 3, in condition (i), for the words and figures 31st day of July, 2003, the words and figures 31st day of July, 2004 shall be substituted.
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944), the Central Government, being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby directs that each of the notifications of the Government of India in the erstwhile Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue).
Circular No.655/46/2002-CX Further, on the matter being referred to the Solicitor General of India (SG), in his detailed opinion dated 3.1.2000, he had opined that sec. 11AB would apply to all adjudication orders passed on or after 28.9.96 irrespective of the fact whether it relates to clearances made before 28.9.96 or after. A copy of the SG”s opinion was sent to all Chief Commissioners vide Board”s letter F.No.387/90/98-JC dated 27.3.2001.
In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 37 read with sub-sections (1) and (3) of section 23C, sub-section (7) of section 23D of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules
– The principal notification was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, vide notification No. 6/2002-Central Excise, dated the 1st March, 2002 [G.S.R. 127 (E), dated the 1st March, 2002] and was last amended by notification No. 42/2002-Central Excise, dated the 21st August, 2002 [G.S.R. No. 587 (E), dated the 21st August, 2002.
he principal notification was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, vide notification No. 6/2002-Central Excise, dated the 1st March, 2002 [G.S.R. 127 (E), dated the 1st March, 2002] and was last amended by notification No. 41/2002-Central Excise, dated the 19th August, 2002 [G.S.R. No. 581 (E), dated the 19th August, 2002.
All goods used within the factory of production for the manufacture of goods falling under chapter 71
Circular No. 654/45/2002-CX I am directed to refer to Board’s circular No.591/28/2001-CX dated 16.10.2001 on the above subject. Consequent to issuance of the circular, certain references were received from field formations to say that the said circular has gone beyond the scope of the rule and that an option has been given to the assessee to reverse the actual credit contained in inputs or pay 8 percent of the price of exempted goods. Accordingly, the matter has been examined.
