Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Anand Mulky Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Anand Mulky Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Turnover Accepted, Receipts Cannot Be Taxed Again– Demonetisation Deposits from Sundry Debtors -Double Taxation Not Permitted- 68 Addition Struck Down Bangalore dealt with addition of cash deposits made during demonetisation. Assessee, engaged in retail trading of Samsung mobile phones & SIM cards, filed his return for AY 2017-18 declaring income of ₹18.46 lakh. During scrutiny, AO noticed cash deposits of ₹8,89,878 in specified bank notes on 10.11.2016 & 15.11.2016. Out of this, ₹2,26,255 was accepted as explained opening balance, while the ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031