Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Non-supply of reasons to reopen assessment makes such notice bad in law

Case Law Details

Case Name
CIT (LTU) vs. IDBI Ltd. (Bombay High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
1993-94
Advertisement CA Saurabh Chokhra Brief of the case: The Hon’ble Bombay HC in the above cited case held that supplying of reasons for reopening assessment is a jurisdictional requirement and non-supplying of the same when the assessee specifically asked for the same would made the reassessment notice bad in law. Facts of the case: For AY 1993-94 the regular assessment u/s 143(3) was completed by an order dated 26 March 1996. Thereafter, on 9 December 1996, the Assessing Officer issued a notice u/s. 147 read with Section 148 of the Act, seeking to reopen the assessment for the Assessm...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Saurabh Chokhra
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Location: Hyderabad, Telangana
Articles Published: 243

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

1 Comment
  1. Sir, still the department believes that there is no mandate for providing reasons alongwith the notice under sec 148.
    Also Sir, is there any law or rule to defend a notice under section 148 which does not have the designation of the officer issuing such notice.Regards,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *