Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vaibhav Nandkishor Patil Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vaibhav Nandkishor Patil Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Mumbai ITAT Deletes Bogus Purchase Addition: Sales Accepted, One-to-One Correlation Proved; Ad-hoc Expense Disallowance Also Quashed Sales Accepted, Purchases Can’t Be Bogus: ITAT Ends MVAT-Based Additions-  Suspicion Is No Substitute for Proof: Hawala Tag Alone Fails Assessee, proprietor of event-management concern M/s Evepro, faced reassessment u/s 147 based solely on information from MVAT Department alleging purchases from a listed hawala dealer. AO treated purchases of ₹15.47 lakh from Adinath Enterprises as bogus u/s 69C & further mad...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031