Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sindhumati Ramavtar Pathak Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sindhumati Ramavtar Pathak Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Sunrise Asian LTCG Held Genuine: ITAT Mumbai Deletes s.68 & s.69C Additions Despite Penny-Stock Allegations ITAT Mumbai (F Bench) in Sindhumati Ramavtar Pathak vs ACIT (ITA No. 4914/Mum/2025, AY 2015-16, order dated 24.12.2025) has allowed the assessee’s appeal, deleting additions made u/s 68 (sale proceeds) and u/s 69C (alleged commission) in respect of Long-Term Capital Gains on sale of shares of Sunrise Asian Ltd. The Assessee, a senior citizen widow and regular investor, purchased shares of Conart Trader’s Ltd. in 2011 through bankin...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031