Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Ashok B. Jiwrajka (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Ashok B. Jiwrajka (ITAT Mumbai) No Incriminating Material, No s.153A Addition: ITAT Mumbai Quashes Penny-Stock LTCG Additions in Search Cases ITAT Mumbai (A Bench) in DCIT vs Ashok B. Jiwrajka (ITA Nos. 2355, 2352, 2353 & 2351/Mum/2021; AYs 2012-13 to 2015-16; order dated 23.12.2025) has dismissed Revenue appeals and allowed assessee’s cross-objections, holding that additions u/s 68 and 69C in unabated years cannot survive in absence of incriminating material found during search. The case arose from a search u/s 132 on 09.04.2015, followed by assessments u/s 153A alleging bogus L...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031