Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CIT Vs Anshuman Singh (ITAT Lucknow)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
CIT Vs Anshuman Singh (ITAT Lucknow) Lucknow Tribunal examined whether CIT(A) was justified in quashing reassessment u/s 147 r.w.s.144/144B. AO had reopened assessment on the ground that Assessee deposited Rs.1,31,63,190 in Bank of Baroda during FY 2016-17, treating it as unexplained. As per assessment order dated 28.03.2022   AO recorded that no information was furnished in response to notices u/s 142(1) &  therefore he completed assessment ex-parte u/s 144. CIT(A) allowed the appeal holding that AO had verified the books, cash book, vouchers & stock statements during original scru...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031