ITAT Lucknow

Section 254(2)- Tribunal cannot review its own order: ITAT

ITO Vs Shri Khaliq Ahmed (ITAT Lucknow)

If the Revenue has any grievance against the order of the Tribunal, the Revenue can go before the High Court by filing appeal u/s 260A. The Tribunal cannot recall its own order in the garb of power vested u/s 254(2) of the Act....

Read More

Ex-parte order for non-attendance during lockdown is unjustified

Uttar Pradesh Water Supply and Sanitation Mission Vs ACIT (ITAT Lucknow)


Read More

No TDS on ocean freight paid to non-resident shipping companies

Shri Suresh Khatri Vs ITO (ITAT Lucknow)

Shri Suresh Khatri Vs ITO (ITAT Lucknow) Ground Nos. 1 to 3 of the appeal relate to the disallowance of Rs.6,42,437/- for non deduction of tax at source u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act on payment of ocean freight, made to non-resident shipping companies. The assessee is a proprietary concern and engaged in the business of […]...

Read More

TCS not applicable on Scrap generated from Trading Activities

Lala Bharat Lal & Sons Vs ITO (ITAT Luknow)

The issue under consideration is whether the TCS u/s 206C at 1% will be applicable on sale of scrap not generated out of manufacturing activities?...

Read More

ITAT stays tax demand because the assessee has a prima facie case in its favour

Lucknow Development Authority Vs ACIT (ITAT Lucknow)

Lucknow Development Authority Vs ACIT (ITAT Lucknow) 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16 & 2016-17 Therefore, at the end ITAT approved to stay the outstanding demand for a period of six months from the date of this order or till disposal of the appeals, whichever is earlier, provided the assessee deposits the above noted amounts within...

Read More

Approval of PCIT mandatory to convert Limited Scrutiny to a Complete Scrutiny

Ravi Prakash Khandelwal Vs DCIT (ITAT Lucknow)

Jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer while making assessments in Limited Scrutiny cases, by initiating inquiries on new issues has to comply with mandatory requirements of the relevant CBDT Instructions dated 09.2014, 29.12.2015 and 14.07.2016, i.e. the approval of the PCIT....

Read More

Fresh additions cannot be made in assessment due to revisional order u/s 263

M/s. Model Tanners (India) (P) Ltd. Vs. ACIT (ITAT Lucknow)

While framing of assessment in pursuance of revisional order passed under section 263, AO was entitled to consider only those items which had been considered by CIT and was not entitled to consider any other item afresh for making addition....

Read More

Warehouse Sub-Letting Rent cannot be taxed as ‘income from house property’

Sushil Tuli Vs ITO (ITAT Lucknow)

There are two pre-conditions for charging the income as income from house property under section 22 of the Act. Firstly, the assessee must be the owner of the property. Also, the property must not be occupied by the assessee for the purposes of his business or In other words, the property should be a residential property....

Read More

Section 80G approval cannot be rejected on the ground that society is not engaged in charitable activities

Shiv Raj Sharma Shiksha Samiti Bilaspur Vs CIT (ITAT Lucknow)

Shiv Raj Sharma Shiksha Samiti Bilaspur Vs CIT (ITAT Lucknow) It is well settled position of law that at the time of granting approval under Section 80G of the Act, what is to be examined is the object of the trust and so far as the aspect of income is concerned, the same can be […]...

Read More

TDS U/s. 194C deductible on AMC for repairs/maintenance of computers

Jagran Prakashan Ltd. Vs ACIT (TDS) (ITAT Lucknow)

Expenditure on account of AMC for repairs and maintenance of computers installed at assessee’s office premises were payments of contractual nature without involving any technical or professional skill or knowledge. Therefore, TDS was rightly deducted by assessee under section 194C, instead of 194J....

Read More

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (4,860)
Company Law (6,331)
Custom Duty (7,841)
DGFT (4,265)
Excise Duty (4,377)
Fema / RBI (4,275)
Finance (4,526)
Income Tax (33,829)
SEBI (3,586)
Service Tax (3,576)