ITAT Lucknow

Approval of PCIT mandatory to convert Limited Scrutiny to a Complete Scrutiny

Ravi Prakash Khandelwal Vs DCIT (ITAT Lucknow)

Jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer while making assessments in Limited Scrutiny cases, by initiating inquiries on new issues has to comply with mandatory requirements of the relevant CBDT Instructions dated 09.2014, 29.12.2015 and 14.07.2016, i.e. the approval of the PCIT....

Read More

Fresh additions cannot be made in assessment due to revisional order u/s 263

M/s. Model Tanners (India) (P) Ltd. Vs. ACIT (ITAT Lucknow)

While framing of assessment in pursuance of revisional order passed under section 263, AO was entitled to consider only those items which had been considered by CIT and was not entitled to consider any other item afresh for making addition....

Read More

Warehouse Sub-Letting Rent cannot be taxed as ‘income from house property’

Sushil Tuli Vs ITO (ITAT Lucknow)

There are two pre-conditions for charging the income as income from house property under section 22 of the Act. Firstly, the assessee must be the owner of the property. Also, the property must not be occupied by the assessee for the purposes of his business or In other words, the property should be a residential property....

Read More

Section 80G approval cannot be rejected on the ground that society is not engaged in charitable activities

Shiv Raj Sharma Shiksha Samiti Bilaspur Vs CIT (ITAT Lucknow)

Shiv Raj Sharma Shiksha Samiti Bilaspur Vs CIT (ITAT Lucknow) It is well settled position of law that at the time of granting approval under Section 80G of the Act, what is to be examined is the object of the trust and so far as the aspect of income is concerned, the same can be […]...

Read More

TDS U/s. 194C deductible on AMC for repairs/maintenance of computers

Jagran Prakashan Ltd. Vs ACIT (TDS) (ITAT Lucknow)

Expenditure on account of AMC for repairs and maintenance of computers installed at assessee’s office premises were payments of contractual nature without involving any technical or professional skill or knowledge. Therefore, TDS was rightly deducted by assessee under section 194C, instead of 194J....

Read More

No addition on mere frequent withdrawal and deposit of own money

DCIT Vs Smt. Veena Awasthi (ITAT Lucknow)

Addition made by AO merely on the ground that assessee made frequent withdrawal and deposit of his own money was not justified as the same was not prohibited under any law....

Read More

No penalty on surrendered amount in revised Income Tax return

Dy. CIT Vs Sushrut Institute of Plastic Surgery (P) Ltd (ITAT Lucknow)

Since assessee had included the surrendered amount in its revised return and no such concealment or non-disclosure was made as assessee had made a complete disclosure of income in its revised return. Therefore, no penalty under section 271(1)(c) could be levied....

Read More

No Default if TDS been deducted & Paid as per Certificate issue U/s. 197

M/s Kribhco Shyam Fertilizers Ltd. Vs ITO (TDS) (ITAT Luknow)

M/s Kribhco Shyam Fertilizers Ltd. Vs ITO (TDS) (ITAT Luknow) On general reading of provisions of section 197 of the Act, it authorizes the Assessing Officer to prescribe deduction of TDS at any lower rate provided the facts and circumstances justify such deduction. Clause (2) of section 197 of the Act further states that when […]...

Read More

ITAT deletes addition under section 40A(3) for Cash payments to BSNL

Kamta Prasad Mittal Vs Dy. CIT (ITAT Lucknow)

Kamta Prasad Mittal Vs Dy. CIT (ITAT Lucknow) It is an undisputed fact that a Demand Note was issued by BSNL requiring the assessee to make payments in cash and genuinity of the payments to BSNL was never doubted by the With regard to the observation of the ld. CIT(A) that BSNL is not a […]...

Read More

No penalty for entering PAN instead of TAN in TDS Challan on account of bona-fide mistake

ITOr Vs M/s Umatech (ITAT Lucknow)

Necessary TDS was deducted and it was deposited in the Government Treasury. All these are on record and only there is a technical error that in the challan PAN number of the assessee is mentioned instead of TAN in the relevant column on account of bona-fide mistake, for which assessee should not be penalized or punished when there is no l...

Read More

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (4,383)
Company Law (5,183)
Custom Duty (7,498)
DGFT (4,055)
Excise Duty (4,280)
Fema / RBI (3,905)
Finance (4,055)
Income Tax (31,295)
SEBI (3,255)
Service Tax (3,484)