Follow Us:

Judiciary

Advance ruling on service tax issue sought – Application rejected as applicant does not qualify to do so as per Sec 96A(C) and 96C(2) of the Finance Act, 1994

January 8, 2007 504 Views 0 comment Print

M/s MACK INSURANCE AUXILIARY SERVICES (P) LTD- Advance Ruling – The application is rejected as not maintainable since the applicant do not fall in the category of organisation who can seek advance ruling in terms of Section 96A(C) and 96C(2) of the Finance Act. 1994.

CIT v. Thayaballi Mulla Jeevaji Kapasi [1967] 66 ITR 147 (SC)

January 1, 2007 2754 Views 0 comment Print

Thayaballi Mulla Jeevaji—hereinafter called the respondent—was a trader in Malabar produce, cloth, pepper and other commodities. For the assessment year 1945-46, the respondent submitted a return disclosing a net business loss of Rs. 7,960. The Income-tax Officer, Kozhikode, District Malabar, completed the assessment on March 29, 1946,

Activity in respect of which advance ruling is sought must be the one which is proposed to be provided

December 20, 2006 1191 Views 0 comment Print

Advance Ruling – The definition of advance ruling makes it abundantly clear that it is concerned with determination of the question of law or fact in relation to service which is proposed to be provided by the applicant- In as much as in this case the activity in respect of which an advance ruling is sought, is not the one which is proposed to be provided but is an ongoing activity, the application is not maintainable.

Interest paid on borrowed capital allowable if used for commercial expediency

December 14, 2006 2796 Views 0 comment Print

Explore the Supreme Court’s verdict in S.A. Builders Ltd vs. CIT (Appeals) Chandigarh & Anr. regarding the allowability of interest on borrowed capital under Section 36(1)(iii). Understand the critical considerations for deductions, including the importance of commercial expediency. Learn how the Court’s insights impact cases involving advances to sister concerns and the nexus between borrowed funds and business purposes. Get a comprehensive understanding of the legal perspectives on interest deduction in business transactions.

Section 40A(3) Exceptions of Rule 6DD are not exhaustive and must be interpreted liberally

November 7, 2006 6422 Views 0 comment Print

Ordinarily where the Income-tax Officer is satisfied about the genuineness of the transaction and payment and identification of the cash payment is established, the Income-tax Officer shall record his satisfaction about the fulfilment of the conditions for allowing the benefit of Rule 6DD(j). Apparently, Section 40A(3) was intended to penalize the tax evader and not the honest transactions and that is why after framing of Rule 6DD(j)

Registration U/s. 12A cannot be denied if CIT not doubted genuineness of activities of trust

September 29, 2006 2184 Views 0 comment Print

Explore the legal case of Aggarwal Mitra Mandal Trust vs. DIT (Exemption) (2007) 293 ITR (AT) 259 (Delhi) where the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal granted insights into the denial of registration under Section 12A. Understand the significance of the CIT’s role in assessing the genuineness of trust activities and objects, and how Section 13(1) applies during income computation. Get detailed analysis and key takeaways from this crucial legal precedent.

s. 54 – Depositing of unutilised portion of capital gain in notified scheme up to expiry of time-limit for filing return U/s. 139(4)

August 29, 2006 2051 Views 0 comment Print

From a plain reading of Sub-section (2) of Section 54 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, it is clear that only Section 139 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, is mentioned in Section 54(2) in the context that the unutilised portion of the capital gain on the sale of property used for residence should be deposited before the date of furnishing the return of the Income-tax under Section 139

Defination of terms used in Section 44AB

August 2, 2006 9869 Views 0 comment Print

This appeal is arising out of the order of the Tribunal dt. 27th April, 2001 sustaining the penalty levied against the assessee-appellant under Section 271B for failure on the part of the assessee to get its accounts audited and obtain the report of such audit before the date prescribed under Section 44AB.

Even in absence of a provision, Beneficial statute may be held to be retrospective in nature

July 26, 2006 8728 Views 1 comment Print

In the case of Vijay v. State of Maharashtra & others (2006) 6 SCC 286 Apex Court held that It is now well-settled that when a literal reading of the provision giving retrospective effect does not produce absurdity or anomaly, the same would not be construed to be only prospective. The negation is not a rigid rule and varies with the intention and purport of the legislature

No Penalty for cash loan accepted out of business exigencies

April 25, 2006 1658 Views 0 comment Print

Explore a landmark Income Tax Appellate Tribunal case from Chennai where a penalty under Section 271D of the Income-tax Act was successfully deleted. The tribunal found that the undisclosed income, as declared in the block return, remained the assessed income. Discover the rationale behind the tribunal’s decision, emphasizing the genuine nature of credits, the agricultural background of creditors, and the firm’s non-professional management. Learn how the tribunal concluded that the acceptance of cash loans was due to business exigencies, establishing a reasonable cause for the exemption from penalties. #IncomeTax #LegalCase #ChennaiTribunal

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930