Advance ruling on service tax issue sought – Application rejected as applicant does not qualify to do so as per Sec 96A(C) and 96C(2) of the Finance Act, 1994

The application is rejected as not maintainable since the applicant do not fall in the category of organisation who can seek advance ruling in terms of Section 96A(C) and 96C(2) of the Finance Act. 1994. BEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOMS & SERVICE TAX) NEW DELHI Order No. AAR/01(ST)/2007 Application No. AAR/15(ST)/2006 Applicant M/s MACK INSURANCE AUXILIARY SERVICES (P) LTD, 114, Jor Bagh New Delhi – 110003 Commissioner Concerned Commissioner of Service Tax New Delhi Present for the Applicant Mr. Deepak Bansal, CA Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Agrawal, Acc...