Case Law Details
Case Name : M/s Mack Insurance Auxiliary Services (P) Ltd (Authority of Advance Rulings- New Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
Advance Rulings
Sponsored
The application is rejected as not maintainable since the applicant do not fall in the category of organisation who can seek advance ruling in terms of Section 96A(C) and 96C(2) of the Finance Act. 1994.
BEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS
(CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOMS & SERVICE TAX)
NEW DELHI
Order No. AAR/01(ST)/2007
Application No. AAR/15(ST)/2006
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.
Subscribe to Our Daily Newsletter
Note: By subscribing, you allow us to send you the latest tax news, product updates, promotional content, and exclusive offers directly to your inbox
Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |