Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M/s Mack Insurance Auxiliary Services (P) Ltd (Authority of Advance Rulings- New Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Advance Rulings
Sponsored

The application is rejected as not maintainable since the applicant do not fall in the category of organisation who can seek advance ruling in terms of Section 96A(C) and 96C(2) of the Finance Act. 1994.

BEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS
(CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOMS & SERVICE TAX)
NEW DELHI

Order No. AAR/01(ST)/2007
Application No. AAR/15(ST)/2006

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Tags:

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31