Case Law Details
Case Name : Smt. Harshila Chordia Vs Income Tax Officer (Rajasthan High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Rajasthan High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Significantly paragraph 5 of Circular by the Board on May 31, 1977 ([1977] 108 ITR (St.) 8) reproduced herein below gives a clear indication that Rule 6DD(j) has to be liberally construed and ordinarily where the genuineness of the transaction and the payment and identity of the receiver is established, the requirement of Rule 6DD(j) must be deemed to have been satisfied. Paragraph 5 of the Circular reads as under [1977] 108 ITR (St.) 8, 9:
5. It can be said that it would, generally, satisfy the requirements of Rule 6DD(j), if a letter to the above effect is produced in respect of each transa...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

