Case Law Details
Case Name : Vijay Vs. State of Maharashtra & others (2006) (Supreme Court of India)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
Supreme Court of India
Held that it is now well-settled that when a literal reading of the provision giving retrospective effect does not produce absurdity or anomaly, the same would not be construed to be only prospective. The negation is not a rigid rule and varies with the intention and purport of the legislature, but to apply it in such a case is a doctrine of fairness. When a law is enacted for the benefit of the community as a whole, even in the absence of a provision, the statute may be held to be retrospective in nature. The appellant does not and cannot question the competence of the legislature in this beh...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Can we apply the doctrine of fairness on the specific relief (amendment) act, 2018?