Income Tax : The Tribunal held that CIT(A) cannot enhance income under Section 251 on matters not considered by the Assessing Officer during as...
Income Tax : The ITAT held that revisional powers under Section 263 cannot be exercised when the Assessing Officer has already examined the iss...
Income Tax : ITAT quashed PCIT’s Section 263 order, holding AO’s treatment of survey income as business income valid and not erroneous or p...
Income Tax : Ahmedabad ITAT quashes reassessments based on ACB report, ruling the AO lacked independent "reason to believe" and only used borro...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune upholds PCIT's order u/s 263, setting aside an assessment for failure to verify ₹82.64 crore in advances for property...
Income Tax : National Chamber of Industries & Commerce, U.P has made a representation against Indiscriminate notices by the Income Tax Depa...
Income Tax : KSCAA has made a Representation on Challenges in Income Tax Related to Rectification Proceedings, Order Giving Effect, Delay in P...
Income Tax : One of the key sources of dispute is the existing arrangement for follow up on audit objections by Internal Audit Party and the Re...
Income Tax : The ITAT Amritsar held that a valuation report by itself cannot justify addition under Section 69 without evidence of extra paymen...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that amortization of BOT road project expenditure must be computed based on the actual concession period and not ...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that the reassessment order could not be revised under Section 263 since the conditions for treating jewellery e...
Income Tax : ITAT Hyderabad held that assessment orders passed pursuant to earlier remand directions were barred by limitation under Section 15...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT held that an Assessing Officer cannot make additions beyond the specific issues remanded by the Principal Commissioner ...
ITAT Pune held that revisionary proceedings under section 263 of the Income Tax Act rightly invoked since AO failed to make necessary enquiries and verification. Accordingly, revisionary proceedings upheld and appeal of assessee dismissed.
ITAT Rajkot quashes a Section 263 order, ruling that the PCIT cannot revise an assessment based on a mere change of opinion when the AO has verified purchases.
The ITAT Ranchi quashed a Section 263 order, ruling that a tax revision cannot be based solely on an audit objection or for the re-examination of an issue already reviewed by the AO.
ITAT Chennai held that passing of an order in the name of dead/ deceased person is not sustainable in law. Accordingly, revisionary order passed by PCIT is liable to be quashed and set aside.
ITAT Mumbai rules that CSR expenses can qualify for a Section 80G deduction, clarifying that the restriction on business deductions under Section 37 does not apply.
Read the full ITAT Indore order on an assessee’s appeal dismissed for a 3-year delay. The court examined reasons for the late filing and rejected the plea for condonation.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Pune, has ruled that a Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) cannot invoke Section 263 to revise an assessment based on mere suspicion or audit objections, especially when the Assessing Officer (AO) has conducted a proper inquiry.
The Mumbai ITAT set aside a PCIT’s revisionary order against Procter and Gamble, ruling the AO’s original inquiry was adequate and not a basis for revision.
ITAT Delhi held that revisionary order passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act is liable to be quashed as no disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act is permissible if no exempt income is earned. Accordingly, appeal allowed.
Subsequently asserted that the twin conditions under Section 263 were absent as the AO had conducted due inquiry. Revenue contended that Section 37(1) disallowed CSR expenses which were not wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business.
