Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bhandari Associates Vs PCIT (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bhandari Associates Vs PCIT (ITAT Pune) Revision u/s 263 invalid when AO conducts Enquiry; Audit Objections alone cannot justify Revisionary action; Tribunal distinguishes Inadequate Inquiry from ‘No Inquiry’ Assessee, a partnership firm engaged in real estate development, filed its return for AY 2018-19 declaring a loss of ₹1.05 crore.  The case was picked for complete scrutiny on issues including investments, contract receipts, &  unsecured loans. The AO, after issuing detailed notices u/s 143(2)/142(1) &  examining submissions, completed assessment u/s 143(3) on 07.04.2021,...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930