Income Tax : One can set up either a public charitable trust, a registered society, or a Section 8 Company (a trust corporation). Each has it...
Company Law : Under Section 2(18) of the Income tax a company is said to be a company in which the public are substantially interested in the fo...
Income Tax : NGO’s or charity work in India can be carried out by various methods/forms of business, such as a Trust/ A society or by a Non-P...
Finance : Forming a, Trust or a Society, or a Company Generally speaking, any organisation that devotes its funds for public welfare is a no...
Company Law : Objectives of Company proposed to be formed under Section 8 of Companies Act 2013 should be to promote commerce, art, science, sp...
Company Law : Government is planning to relax exit norms for not-for-profit companies to allow them to de-register without having to follow cumb...
Company Law : The government today eased rules for incorporating not-for-profit companies, by giving the Registrar of companies the power to dir...
CA, CS, CMA : As you may be aware that the ICAI has taken a lead role in the development and promotion of XBRL in India and has accordingly set ...
Company Law : The government is planning to permit corporate houses to set up higher educational institutions -- like multi-disciplinary univers...
Corporate Law : The issue was whether the NCLT could declare ownership of a trademark during CIRP. The Supreme Court held that title disputes not ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Madras High Court set aside a GST demand after finding that the assessing officer failed to consider binding CBIC circulars cl...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that the Successful Resolution Applicant [SRA] cannot be forced to deal with claims that are not a part of the ...
Custom Duty : CESTAT Hyderabad held that exemption notification no. 57/2000 issued u/s. 25 of the Customs Act, 1962 prevails over CBEC circular ...
Corporate Law : NCLT Chennai held that as per section 128 of the Indian Contract Act, the liability of guarantor is coextensive with that of the B...
Company Law : Proposed guidelines for conversion of section 25 company (non profit company) to an ordinary company under Companies Act, 1956. -...
Bombay High Court granted conditional bail to Customs House Agent involved in transportation of drugs since applicant is already in custody for last 3 years and conclusion of trial in near future is a remote possibility.
Punjab and Haryana High Court held that cancellation of GST registration for entire places of business for non-submission of NOC by landowner of additional place of business is complete non-application of mind. Accordingly, cancellation of GST registration not justified.
Supreme Court held that press release cannot be the basis of changing the law. Exemption under the Customs Act has to be via issuance of notification as provided by the Customs Act. Thus, press release cannot be basis for giving away with old legal regime.
M/s. Hyundai Motor India Limited, Kanchipuram (HMIL), are engaged in the manufacture of passenger motor cars, under the brand name of “Hyundai”. They import various parts and accessories of passenger motor cars through Chennai ports.
The owners entered into a Development Agreement with New India City Developers Private Limited ( Developer ) to develop a group housing project and an IT Park on the said land after obtaining the required approvals.
This would lead one to the inescapable conclusion of no perceivable or plausible tax liability possibly being created. Consequently, the proceedings initiated in terms of the impugned SCNs‟ and their continuance would be futile and impractical.
Delhi High Court held that interest under section 42 of Delhi Value Added Tax Act entitled to the petitioner as department has illegally retained the money of the petitioner for the long time.
Delhi High Court held that department cannot possibly seek to justify the retention of refund claim on account of its having been deposited voluntarily or being barred by limitation. Accordingly, refund claim allowed.
Section 36(1)(vii) of ITA applied separately to non-rural debts, while Section 36(1)(viia) of the tax statute only applied to rural debts, making it clear that banks were entitled to claim both deductions, provided they pertained to different types of advances.
Held that the export of services by the petitioner is an aspect which is neither disputed nor doubted. The only objection which is raised and which constitutes the basis for denial of refund is the remittance by VGSL to the bank account of the Bangalore office.
