Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Custom Duty

Department failed to discharge burden of proof for classifying ECU under 8708 9090: CESTAT Chennai

Case Law Details

Case Name
Hyundai Motors India Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement Hyundai Motors India Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai) CESTAT Chennai held that since department has not discharged the burden of proof showing that Electronic Control Unit (ECU) is classifiable under CTH 8708 9090 hence the classification declared by the assessee will prevail. Thus, benefit of notification no. 46/2011 allowed. Facts- M/s. Hyundai Motor India Limited, Kanchipuram (HMIL), are engaged in the manufacture of passenger motor cars, under the brand name of “Hyundai”. They import various parts and accessories of passenger motor cars through C...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *