Income Tax : One can set up either a public charitable trust, a registered society, or a Section 8 Company (a trust corporation). Each has it...
Company Law : Under Section 2(18) of the Income tax a company is said to be a company in which the public are substantially interested in the fo...
Income Tax : NGO’s or charity work in India can be carried out by various methods/forms of business, such as a Trust/ A society or by a Non-P...
Finance : Forming a, Trust or a Society, or a Company Generally speaking, any organisation that devotes its funds for public welfare is a no...
Company Law : Objectives of Company proposed to be formed under Section 8 of Companies Act 2013 should be to promote commerce, art, science, sp...
Company Law : Government is planning to relax exit norms for not-for-profit companies to allow them to de-register without having to follow cumb...
Company Law : The government today eased rules for incorporating not-for-profit companies, by giving the Registrar of companies the power to dir...
CA, CS, CMA : As you may be aware that the ICAI has taken a lead role in the development and promotion of XBRL in India and has accordingly set ...
Company Law : The government is planning to permit corporate houses to set up higher educational institutions -- like multi-disciplinary univers...
Custom Duty : Revenue argued that the refund claims were time-barred and that Section 27 of the Customs Act should apply strictly. They further ...
Custom Duty : Madras High Court held that the goods imported, even though exempted from basic customs duty, may still be subject to levy of add...
Custom Duty : CESTAT Ahmedabad held that Chartered Accountant certificate stated that duty incidence has not been passed on to the customers. He...
Corporate Law : NCLT Chandigarh held that since resolution plan in respect of Nav Jyoti Agro Foods Private Limited meets requirement of section 30...
Income Tax : Delhi High Court held that application of funds by Indian Broadcasting Foundation in BARC doesn’t qualify as deployment was not ...
Company Law : Proposed guidelines for conversion of section 25 company (non profit company) to an ordinary company under Companies Act, 1956. -...
Revenue argued that the refund claims were time-barred and that Section 27 of the Customs Act should apply strictly. They further submitted that the Supreme Court had not conclusively resolved the divergence between the Delhi and Bombay High Court positions. On appeal.
Madras High Court held that the goods imported, even though exempted from basic customs duty, may still be subject to levy of additional duty under the respective enactments.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that Chartered Accountant certificate stated that duty incidence has not been passed on to the customers. Hence, refund cannot be rejected by brushing aside Chartered Accountant certificate without any cogent reason.
NCLT Chandigarh held that since resolution plan in respect of Nav Jyoti Agro Foods Private Limited meets requirement of section 30(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 the same stands approved as filed by the resolution professional.
Delhi High Court held that application of funds by Indian Broadcasting Foundation in BARC doesn’t qualify as deployment was not intended to yield income/profit hence denial of exemption u/s. 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act not justified.
CESTAT Delhi held that exemption notification 146/94-Cus doesn’t state ‘Actual User’ condition. Accordingly, confiscation of imported arms and ammunitions is liable to be set aside.
While at the time of debonding, the value of raw material cleared had to be valued at the time of importation, and the rate of duty was the effective rate of duty leviable on the imported goods at the time of debonding.
CESTAT Delhi held that Amendment Notification no. 36/2021-Customs dated 19.07.2021 cannot be said to be retrospective in nature. Accordingly, orders are liable to be set aside and all the appeals are allowed.
It was held that in the original assessment under Section 143(1), the issue related to the deed of purchase of land was not looked into as the same was not reported in the assessee’s income before the Revenue.
ITAT Delhi held that accumulation under section 11(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act is to be allowed at 15% of gross receipts. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee allowed.
