Finance : Explore the recent amendment to Section 43B of the Income Tax Act aimed at bolstering the financial well-being of MSMEs through ti...
Income Tax : Learn how recent tax code amendments (Section 43B(h)) impact businesses' deductions for Micro and Small Enterprise (MSE) payments....
Income Tax : Explore the impact of Finance Act, 2023, on MSME payment enforcement under section 43B(h) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Understand ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Income Tax : Section 22 of the Income tax Act, 1961 is the charging section for head Income from House Property. As per this section, the asses...
Income Tax : Bombay Chartered Accountants' Society has made a Representation on 'Suggestions for Amendments in the Income Tax Act', on 24th May...
Income Tax : This is a new clause inserted by the Central Board of Direct Taxes through its Notification No. 36/2009 dated 13-4-2009, in the Fo...
Finance : Actor Emraan Hashmi, who was refused an NOC to buy a flat in Nibbana housing society at Pali Hill allegedly because he was a Musli...
Income Tax : The Mumbai ITAT reaffirmed that lease rentals from SEZ and IT Parks along with amenities are taxable as business income. The rulin...
Fema / RBI : The Tribunal ruled that transactions predating the alleged crime cannot be treated as proceeds of crime without a clear link. It s...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that unfinished properties classified as work-in-progress cannot be subjected to notional rent under section 23....
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that negligence on part of bank in presentation of cheque within the validity period of cheque leads to ‘defi...
Corporate Law : The dispute concerned whether courts could revisit the validity of an arbitration clause after appointing an arbitrator. The Supre...
Corporate Law : Discover the latest MSME policy urging MSEs to include EM numbers on documents for better identification and compliance with incom...
Supreme Court held that petition under section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is not maintainable since disputed that are related to non-payment of wages and legality and propriety of termination are non-arbitrable.
Allahabad High Court held that non-production of documents which were relied upon by the department amounts to violation of principles of natural justice. Accordingly, impugned order liable to be quashed.
CESTAT Allahabad held that claim of cash refund of service tax paid under RCM not admissible since CENVAT Credit was never claimed and transitional provisions under GST was not complied.
CESTAT Chennai held that no customs duty could be demanded on the material intended for use in the factory, however, were destroyed by fire accident. Accordingly, duty demand not sustained.
Assessee was in the business of construction and in developing housing complexes i.e to construct the property and sell it therefore, unsold flats held as stock-in-trade should be treated as business stock, not income from house property.
Assessee was engaged in the business of purchasing and renting properties, as also the entire income of the assessee was based on the income received from leasing its properties.
As per AO, Shri Birat Chandra Dagara was one of the partner of the assessee firm and had owned the mining lease and submitted the details as per which the assessee was found indulged in the illegal production of iron ore.
Held that the land in question was purchased as an agricultural land and at the time of survey, it was also not in dispute that the proceedings of Section 143 of UPZA and LR Act were not initiated and the land in question was not declared as an abadi land.
It is Petitioner’s case that a show cause notice dated 7th December 2023 without any details was issued calling upon Petitioner to attend the office of Respondent No.2. Respondent No.2 proceeded to pass the impugned order dated 28th March 2024 u/s. 23 of the MVAT Act.
ITAT Chennai held that section 23 of the Central Act provides for exemption of Income-tax to the Advocates Welfare Fund of the State. Accordingly, exemption granted and appeal of revenue dismissed.
