Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rushikesh construction Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Rushikesh construction Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Notional Rent on Work-in-Progress Invalid – Section 23 Misapplied The ITAT held that the Assessing Officer wrongly invoked section 23(4)(b) to compute notional rental income on unsold properties held by a builder. The AO treated closing stock as finished goods and calculated notional rent, making an addition of ₹5.02 lakh. However, the Tribunal observed that the properties were work-in-progress (WIP) and construction was not complete. Therefore, they could not be considered as completed units capable of generating rental income. Further, the am...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031