Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bajaj Carpet Industries Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Allahabad)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bajaj Carpet Industries Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Allahabad) CESTAT Allahabad held that claim of cash refund of service tax paid under RCM not admissible since CENVAT Credit was never claimed and transitional provisions under GST was not complied. Facts- The Appellant is engaged in the manufacture of carpets and receives several inputs, input services and capital goods for this purpose. During June 2017, the Appellant received Manpower supply agency services Goods transport agency services, Works contract services and Legal consultancy services on which service tax amounti...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930