Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs K Raheja Corp Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs K Raheja Corp Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai) SEZ Lease Rentals Are Business Income, Not House Property: ITAT Rejects Revenue’s Repeated Challenge Against K Raheja The Mumbai ITAT reaffirmed that lease rentals from SEZ/IT Parks are taxable as “business income” and not as “income from house property”, while also holding that in abated Section 153A assessments, an assessee is entitled to make fresh beneficial claims even if a different stand was taken in the original return. K Raheja Corp had originally offered rental income from its IT parks under the head “house property”, ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails When AO Taxes a Different Income Than the One Recorded in Reasons ITAT Quashes Reassessment: Only Profit Element Matters, Not Entire Commodity Transaction Value ITAT Upholds Denial of Section 80GGC Deduction for Donations to Alleged Accommodation Entry Political Party SBI Wins LTC TDS Dispute: No Assessee-in-Default When Bank Followed High Court Orders ITAT: Profit Cannot Be Estimated Arbitrarily Merely Because Books Were Not Produced View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930