Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs K Raheja Corp Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs K Raheja Corp Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai) SEZ Lease Rentals Are Business Income, Not House Property: ITAT Rejects Revenue’s Repeated Challenge Against K Raheja The Mumbai ITAT reaffirmed that lease rentals from SEZ/IT Parks are taxable as “business income” and not as “income from house property”, while also holding that in abated Section 153A assessments, an assessee is entitled to make fresh beneficial claims even if a different stand was taken in the original return. K Raheja Corp had originally offered rental income from its IT parks under the head “house property”, ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

CSR Disallowance Under Section 37 Does Not Bar Relief Under Section 80G- Bangalore ITAT Bangalore ITAT Deletes ₹99.24 Lakh Ad Hoc Disallowance Backed by Evidence Bangalore ITAT Upholds Section 11 Exemption Despite Alleged Capitation Fee Collections Bangalore ITAT Allows Mine Development Expenditure as Revenue Expense; Deletes Double Addition ITAT Allows Exemption for BSNL VRS Compensation and Leave Encashment View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930