This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
SBP Regime: Once Arbitrator Appointed U/s 11, Validity of Arbitration Clause Cannot Be Reopened U/s 34
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Eminent Colonizers Private Limited Vs Rajasthan Housing Board And Ors. (Supreme Court of India)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- Supreme Court of India
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Eminent Colonizers Private Limited Vs Rajasthan Housing Board And Ors. (Supreme Court of India)
The Supreme Court of India has held that where an arbitrator was appointed under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 prior to the 2015 Amendment (SBP & Co. regime), the existence and validity of the arbitration agreement stand conclusively decided, and cannot thereafter be reopened either before the arbitrator or in proceedings u/s 34 or u/s 37.
In the present case, disputes arose under construction contracts containing Clause 23, which provided for refere...





