Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : Learn the updated provisions governing rectification, assessments, reassessments, and appeals under the Income-tax Act. This guide...
Income Tax : The article explains how the Finance Acts, 2025 and 2026 have reshaped the Updated Return regime under Section 139(8A). It highlig...
Income Tax : The Supreme Court has remitted reassessment cases for fresh consideration after the retrospective insertion of Section 147A, leavi...
Income Tax : This article explains why reassessment proceedings may be invalid if the Assessing Officer merely relies on Investigation Wing rep...
Income Tax : Learn about the new block assessment provisions for cases involving searches under section 132 and requisitions under section 132A...
Income Tax : Discover how Finance Act 2021 revamped assessment and reassessment procedures under Income-tax Act, impacting notices, time limits...
Income Tax : Humble Representation for modification of Section 151 of the Income Tax Act relating to Sanction for issue of Notice under sec. 14...
Income Tax : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association requested CBDT to issue Clarification in respect of the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme...
Income Tax : In view of Indiscriminate notices by income Tax Department without allowing reasonable time it is requested to Finance Ministry an...
Income Tax : Where unaccounted sales were established through seized material, only the net profit embedded therein was liable to tax, and not ...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai remanded the case to examine whether Section 56(2)(x) applied based on the agreement date and to consider refund of ex...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore remanded a Section 69A addition after holding that an APMC commission agent's entire sale proceeds could not be tre...
Income Tax : ITAT Kolkata condoned appeal delay, set aside the CIT(A)'s order, and remanded the assessment for fresh adjudication after grantin...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai quashed reassessment after finding no Section 143(2) notice and that the AO issued a final order disguised as a draft ...
Income Tax : The department has identified high-risk cases through its Insight Portal for AYs 2022-25. It directs officers to initiate reassess...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Explore the latest guidelines for issuing notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Understand key procedures, amendme...
Income Tax : Explore e-Verification Instruction No. 2 of 2024 from the Directorate of Income Tax (Systems). Detailed guidelines for AOs under I...
Income Tax : Supreme Court in the matter of Shri Ashish Agarwal, several representations were received asking for time-barring date of such cas...
The Gujarat High Court held that the Assessing Officer relied only on information from the Maharashtra Sales Tax Department without conducting independent verification. It upheld the restriction of the addition to 5% and dismissed the Revenues appeal.
The Court held that Section 263 could not be invoked where the AO had raised queries, examined replies and completed the assessment.
Karnataka HC held that a Section 148A(b) notice granting less than seven days for compliance is invalid, making all consequential proceedings unsustainable.
ITAT held that failure to obtain a tax audit does not automatically justify rejecting books and estimating profit at 8% without proper examination.
ITAT directed the AO to verify Form 26AS and the corresponding income before deciding the TDS credit claim instead of denying it outright.
ITAT held that Section 54F deduction cannot be denied where capital gains are invested in a residential house within the prescribed period despite non-deposit in the Capital Gains Account Scheme.
Learn the updated provisions governing rectification, assessments, reassessments, and appeals under the Income-tax Act. This guide explains procedures, timelines, appellate remedies, and taxpayer rights after the Finance Act, 2026.
ITAT Delhi held that applying the gross profit rate of a different assessment year was excessive. It reduced the addition to 1% GP while holding that purchases still required proof of genuineness.
Receipts earned by a German resident individual from rendering managerial, consultancy and business development services outside India, based on personal expertise and independent professional skill, constituted independent professional services under Article 14 of the India–Germany DTAA and were not taxable in India in the absence of a fixed base or the prescribed period of stay in India
The Tribunal ruled that proceedings initiated under the old Section 153C framework after the Finance Act, 2021 amendments were legally unsustainable. It set aside all assessment orders for want of jurisdiction.
