Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

ITAT Reduces Section 271(1)(b) Penalty by treating Multiple Notice Defaults as One

Case Law Details

Case Name
Naga Malleswari Mannava Vs ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2015-16
Advertisement Naga Malleswari Mannava Vs ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam) ITAT Holds Section 271(1)(b) Proceedings Independent of Section 148 Reassessment Challenge; No Relief From Penalty Without Proving Reasonable Cause for Non-Compliance Summary: The ITAT Visakhapatnam partly allowed the assessee’s appeal against penalty levied under Section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act for non-compliance with notices issued under Section 142(1). The Assessing Officer had imposed a penalty of Rs.30,000 after treating non-compliance with three separate notices as three independent defaults. The CIT(A) conf...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Ajay Kumar Agrawal
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: AJAY K AGRAWAL AND ASSOCIATES
Location: NEW DELHI, Delhi
Articles Published: 273

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *