Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sunil Sharma Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sunil Sharma Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Unsigned Digital Reassessment Notices Held Void – ITAT Quashes Entire 147 Proceedings The Delhi ITAT quashed reassessment proceedings against the assessee after holding that notices issued u/s 148A(b), order passed u/s 148A(d) and notice issued u/s 148 were invalid since they were not digitally signed by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal noted that the reassessment proceedings were conducted through the e-proceedings mechanism, and CBDT Instruction No. 1/2018 specifically mandates that all notices, communications and orders issued through e-proceedings ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930