#Section 148
Log in to FollowLatest Section 148 updates, provisions, case laws, compliance requirements, tax implications and expert analysis under Income-tax law on TaxGuru.

Section 54F Not Mandates Use of specific fund for new investment: ITAT Chennai

Investments from NRE Accounts not taxable under Section 10(d) of Income Tax

PCCIT sanction Required for Reopening Notice After 3 Years: Bombay HC

Gross Profit Addition on Bogus Purchases should Align with Genuine Ones

Amount received towards Interconnectivity Utility charges from Indian Customers was not taxable as Royalty

No addition u/s 68 as assessee had not benefited from Round-Tripping of Share Transactions

Assessment Based on Mere Unverified Third Party Statement Bad in Law: ITAT Mumbai

Assessment Reopening Limited to Four Years if there was Full Disclosure by Assessee

Non-payment of tax before first appeal filing not fatal if appellant fulfills tax obligation later

Reassessment cannot be based solely on reasons borrowed from other departments or reports

Contractor’s statement alone insufficient to establish a transaction as benami

High Court Quashes Invalid Notice & Order: AO Lacks Jurisdiction

Section 148 Notice Invalid; Should Have Followed Faceless Regime: Section 151A

Section 143(1) Assessment cannot be Reopened on Mere Suspicion: Bombay HC
Explore the latest Section 148 updates on TaxGuru, including relevant Income-tax Act provisions, rules, notifications, circulars, judicial decisions and compliance guidance. The coverage highlights important tax positions, procedural requirements, assessments, deductions, penalties and litigation developments to help taxpayers and professionals understand the practical implications of changes in income-tax law.
