Case Law Details
Case Name : Mohammed Umaruddin Khamruddin Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Bangalore
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already subscribed? Login here to access.
Mohammed Umaruddin Khamruddin Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
APMC Commission Agent Cannot Be Taxed on Entire Sale Proceeds-Bengaluru ITAT Remands ₹2.67 Crore Cash Deposit Addition
The Bengaluru ITAT held that cash deposits made by an APMC commission agent cannot automatically be treated as unexplained money under section 69A, merely because they exceed the turnover disclosed in the return of income. The Tribunal restored the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh verification after finding that the assessee had produced prima facie evidence showing that he was merely acting as a commission agent...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

