Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sekhon Jagtar Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Sekhon Jagtar Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)

ITAT Bangalore held that imposition of penalty under section 270A of the Income Tax Act on account of underreporting of income not justified as failing to furnish income tax return was bona fide.

Facts- The assessee in the present case is an individual who has not filed return of income u/s 139 of the Act for the year under consideration. As such, the assessee disclosed the income under the head ‘salary’ in response to the notices issued u/s 148 of the Act by furnishing form 16. Likewise, the AO during the asse

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31