Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

No penalty u/s. 270A as non-furnishing of return was bona fide: ITAT Bangalore

Case Law Details

Case Name
Sekhon Jagtar Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2017-18
Advertisement Sekhon Jagtar Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT Bangalore held that imposition of penalty under section 270A of the Income Tax Act on account of underreporting of income not justified as failing to furnish income tax return was bona fide. Facts- The assessee in the present case is an individual who has not filed return of income u/s 139 of the Act for the year under consideration. As such, the assessee disclosed the income under the head ‘salary’ in response to the notices issued u/s 148 of the Act by furnishing form 16. Likewise, the AO during the assessment proceedings ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *