#Section 148
Log in to FollowLatest Section 148 updates, provisions, case laws, compliance requirements, tax implications and expert analysis under Income-tax law on TaxGuru.

ITAT Mumbai: Second Reopening Based on Same Material Is Invalid-Change of Opinion Not Permissible

ITAT Mumbai: Reopening Invalid Without Proper Sanction-Approval by Wrong Authority Vitiates Entire Proceedings

ITAT Mumbai: Interest from Co-Operative Banks Eligible U/s 80P(2)(d)-Consistency Principle Applied

ITAT Mumbai: Reopening Beyond 3 Years Invalid Where Escaped Income below ₹50L-Notice u/s 148 Quashed

ITAT Mumbai: Redevelopment Hardship Compensation is Capital Receipt-Addition Deleted for Double Taxation

ITAT Mumbai: Reopening Invalid Without Proper Sanction-Entire Assessment Quashed

Delhi HC Quashed Reassessment Notice Due to Absence of ‘Asset’ for Extended Limitation

Co-Ownership with PArents Not Enough for Unexplained Investment Addition: ITAT Mumbai

Reassessment Quashed as Time-Barred Due to Post-2021 Notice for AY 2015–16

Reopening Invalid as Based on Issue Already Decided in Earlier Year: Gujarat HC

Delhi HC Quashed Reassessment Notice as Issued Beyond Six-Year Limitation Period

Non-service of statutory notice prior to initiation of proceedings u/s. 148 not tenable: Matter remitted

Unexplained Cash Deposits Addition Reduced Because Only Peak Balance Taxable: ITAT Ahmedabad

Chhattisgarh HC Set Aside Reassessment Order Due to Non-Compliance with SC Rulings
Explore the latest Section 148 updates on TaxGuru, including relevant Income-tax Act provisions, rules, notifications, circulars, judicial decisions and compliance guidance. The coverage highlights important tax positions, procedural requirements, assessments, deductions, penalties and litigation developments to help taxpayers and professionals understand the practical implications of changes in income-tax law.
