Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Urban Nirmal LLP Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Urban Nirmal LLP Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)

ITAT Kolkata held that reassessment framed u/s 147 r.w.s. 144/144B is invalid where mandatory notice u/s 143(2) was not issued. Assessee had originally filed return u/s 139(1) & in response to notice u/s 148, duly intimated AO to treat the original return as return filed pursuant to reopening. Despite this, AO failed to issue notice u/s 143(2) & proceeded to complete reassessment making addition of ₹1.24 crore towards cash credit.

Tribunal admitted the additional legal ground challengi

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Excused Where Notices Never Reached the Assessee Rejection of Motion in One House Does Not Stall Judge Inquiry Section 263 Invoked for Lack of Inquiry into Exceptional Items Post-Checkmate Law: Late PF/ESI Deposits Mandate Disallowance Audit Penalty Set Aside Due to Bona Fide Cause for Delay View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031