Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Urban Nirmal LLP Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Urban Nirmal LLP Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)

ITAT Kolkata held that reassessment framed u/s 147 r.w.s. 144/144B is invalid where mandatory notice u/s 143(2) was not issued. Assessee had originally filed return u/s 139(1) & in response to notice u/s 148, duly intimated AO to treat the original return as return filed pursuant to reopening. Despite this, AO failed to issue notice u/s 143(2) & proceeded to complete reassessment making addition of ₹1.24 crore towards cash credit.

Tribunal admitted the additional legal ground challengi

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Bogus Purchase Cases: Only Profit Element Taxable; 4% GP Addition Upheld on ₹5.79 Cr Purchases Recorded Sales Cannot Be Taxed Again u/s 68; Additions Based Only on Third-Party Statement Deleted Final Orders After DRP Beyond Section 153 Limit Quashed Despite Pending Supreme Court Reference Cash Advance Adjusted Through Tripartite Deal Not Unexplained Cash Credit u/s 68 Final Assessment Ignoring DRP Directions Held Void; No Post-Limitation Cure Permissible View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031