Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Malkit Kaur Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Malkit Kaur Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) Penalty can’t survive when quantum is unsettled: ITAT Chandigarh remands 271 penalty to await fate of addition Chandigarh Tribunal held that penalty proceedings cannot attain finality when the very quantum addition forming the foundation of penalty stands remanded. Tribunal noted that the quantum addition had already been set aside & remanded to CIT(A) by ITAT vide order dated 30-05-2025. Since penalty is merely an offshoot of quantum proceedings, confirmation of penalty by CIT(A)/NFAC without awaiting outcome of quantum appeal was held to be untenabl...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930