Income Tax : ITAT held that additions based solely on third-party search material without independent evidence or cross-examination are invalid...
Income Tax : A detailed look at how the Finance Act, 2021 reshaped Sections 147–151, introduced Section 148A, and reduced limitation periods ...
Income Tax : The Finance Bill, 2026 clarifies who can issue notices under sections 148 and 148A. It confirms that only jurisdictional Assessing...
Goods and Services Tax : The court held that once late fee is imposed for delayed annual return filing, a further general penalty is not permissible. Secti...
Income Tax : The issue was whether an assessment could be reopened after four years. The Court held that full disclosure by the taxpayer barred...
Income Tax : Learn about the new block assessment provisions for cases involving searches under section 132 and requisitions under section 132A...
Income Tax : Discover how Finance Act 2021 revamped assessment and reassessment procedures under Income-tax Act, impacting notices, time limits...
Income Tax : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association requested CBDT to issue Clarification in respect of the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme...
Income Tax : In view of Indiscriminate notices by income Tax Department without allowing reasonable time it is requested to Finance Ministry an...
Income Tax : Lucknow CA Tax Practicioners Association has made a Representation to FM for Extension of Time Limit for Assessment cases time bar...
Income Tax : The issue was deletion of additions on unsecured loans treated as unexplained cash credits. The tribunal upheld deletion, holding ...
Income Tax : The issue involved dismissal of appeal due to delay and non-appearance. The tribunal condoned the delay citing medical reasons and...
Income Tax : The issue was whether reassessment could be initiated after four years without fresh evidence. The court held such reopening inval...
Income Tax : The issue was whether reassessment notice issued without approval from the correct authority is valid. The tribunal held it invali...
Income Tax : The Court held that reassessment proceedings must be initiated within the statutory time limit. It found the notice issued after t...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Excise Duty : Notification No. 29/2024-Central Excise rescinds six 2022 excise notifications in the public interest, effective immediately. Deta...
Income Tax : Learn how to initiate proceedings under section 147 of the IT Act in e-Verification cases. Detailed instructions for Assessing Off...
Income Tax : Explore e-Verification Instruction No. 2 of 2024 from the Directorate of Income Tax (Systems). Detailed guidelines for AOs under I...
Income Tax : Supreme Court in the matter of Shri Ashish Agarwal, several representations were received asking for time-barring date of such cas...
Understand the implications of non-deduction of TDS under section 195(1) of the Income Tax Act, resulting in proposed disallowance under section 40(a)(i) by ITAT Bangalore.
Delhi ITAT rules management fee on ECB falls under ‘interest’ as per Sec 2(28A), exempt under India-Germany DTAA Art.11, aiding Aka Ausfuhrrkreditgesellschaft MBH.
ITAT Ahmedabad sets aside re-assessment proceedings initiated after 4 years from the AY end, citing no new material for reassessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act.
Mumbai ITAT rules in favor of Speco Infrastructure, maintaining deletions of tax additions by appellate authority in a reasoned order for AY 2013-14.
Uncover the Delhi ITAT ruling where cash deposits from sale proceeds, if properly explained, aren’t deemed unexplained credits. Read a detailed case analysis.
Chennai ITAT finds revisionary authority’s exercise of jurisdiction under section 263 invalid when a larger issue is pending before CIT(A), upholding legal precedents.
ITAT Ahmedabad dismisses Haresh Acids and Chemicals Pvt Ltd’s appeal, rejecting deduction under Section 35(1)(ii) for bogus donation bills, emphasizing legal compliance.
ITAT Ahmedabad rules in favor of Kapilaben Patel, deleting the penalty under Section 271(1)(C) for undisclosed income, highlighting voluntary disclosure’s importance.
In the case of Shiv Kumar Nayyar vs. DCIT, the Delhi ITAT nullified an addition of cash investment, citing lack of proper application of mind in proceedings.
Kerala High Court dismisses Jibu John’s writ petition challenging assessment reopening under Section 147 for income exceeding Rs. 50 lakhs.
