This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Reassessment notice under section 148 served after date of limitation is bad-in-law: ITAT Kolkata
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Pradip Chandra Roy Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2014-15
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Kolkata
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Pradip Chandra Roy Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
ITAT Kolkata held that reassessment order quashed since notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act was served after the date of limitation. Since issuance of notice is bad in law, consequent orders is liable to be quashed.
Facts- The assessee, a retired person of Group-D staff of PWD Department, Government of West Bengal. AO issued notice u/s 133(6) of the Act on 29.08.2016 on the basis that the Department was in possession of information regarding transaction made by the assessee in immovable property in the F.Y. 2013-14. No...


