Case Law Details
Case Name : Mitul Jagdishchandra Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2022-23
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mitul Jagdishchandra Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Pune ITAT Deletes ₹50 Lakh Penalty U/s 271D; Third-Party Statement Alone Cannot Prove Cash Loan
In a significant ruling, the Pune ITAT deleted a penalty of ₹50 lakh levied under section 271D for alleged violation of section 269SS, holding that the Revenue cannot impose penalty merely on the basis of a third-party statement and loose papers without any independent corroborative evidence proving receipt of a cash loan.
The assessee was alleged to have received a cash loan of ₹50 lakh from another person based on information gathered during a sea...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

