Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mitul Jagdishchandra Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2022-23
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mitul Jagdishchandra Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Pune ITAT Deletes ₹50 Lakh Penalty U/s 271D; Third-Party Statement Alone Cannot Prove Cash Loan In a significant ruling, the Pune ITAT deleted a penalty of ₹50 lakh levied under section 271D for alleged violation of section 269SS, holding that the Revenue cannot impose penalty merely on the basis of a third-party statement and loose papers without any independent corroborative evidence proving receipt of a cash loan. The assessee was alleged to have received a cash loan of ₹50 lakh from another person based on information gathered during a sea...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54B: Time to Revisit Rural Agricultural Land Withdrawal Rules Section 80P(2)(d) Deduction Allowed on Interest from Co-operative Bank Deposits: ITAT Pune Section 154 Rectification Rejected as Wrong Deductor Details Required Verification: ITAT Pune Gratuity Trust Contribution and Export Commission Allowed After Subsequent Trust Approval: ITAT Mumbai Section 270A Penalty Deleted as Bombay HC Quashed Section 148 Reassessment Notice: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031