Income Tax : ITAT held that additions based solely on third-party search material without independent evidence or cross-examination are invalid...
Income Tax : A detailed look at how the Finance Act, 2021 reshaped Sections 147–151, introduced Section 148A, and reduced limitation periods ...
Income Tax : The Finance Bill, 2026 clarifies who can issue notices under sections 148 and 148A. It confirms that only jurisdictional Assessing...
Goods and Services Tax : The court held that once late fee is imposed for delayed annual return filing, a further general penalty is not permissible. Secti...
Income Tax : The issue was whether an assessment could be reopened after four years. The Court held that full disclosure by the taxpayer barred...
Income Tax : Learn about the new block assessment provisions for cases involving searches under section 132 and requisitions under section 132A...
Income Tax : Discover how Finance Act 2021 revamped assessment and reassessment procedures under Income-tax Act, impacting notices, time limits...
Income Tax : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association requested CBDT to issue Clarification in respect of the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme...
Income Tax : In view of Indiscriminate notices by income Tax Department without allowing reasonable time it is requested to Finance Ministry an...
Income Tax : Lucknow CA Tax Practicioners Association has made a Representation to FM for Extension of Time Limit for Assessment cases time bar...
Income Tax : The issue was deletion of additions on unsecured loans treated as unexplained cash credits. The tribunal upheld deletion, holding ...
Income Tax : The issue involved dismissal of appeal due to delay and non-appearance. The tribunal condoned the delay citing medical reasons and...
Income Tax : The issue was whether reassessment could be initiated after four years without fresh evidence. The court held such reopening inval...
Income Tax : The issue was whether reassessment notice issued without approval from the correct authority is valid. The tribunal held it invali...
Income Tax : The Court held that reassessment proceedings must be initiated within the statutory time limit. It found the notice issued after t...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Excise Duty : Notification No. 29/2024-Central Excise rescinds six 2022 excise notifications in the public interest, effective immediately. Deta...
Income Tax : Learn how to initiate proceedings under section 147 of the IT Act in e-Verification cases. Detailed instructions for Assessing Off...
Income Tax : Explore e-Verification Instruction No. 2 of 2024 from the Directorate of Income Tax (Systems). Detailed guidelines for AOs under I...
Income Tax : Supreme Court in the matter of Shri Ashish Agarwal, several representations were received asking for time-barring date of such cas...
Bombay High Court quashes reassessment notice against Kartik Gandhi for AY 2019-20, highlighting issues with Section 148 and 151 approvals.
ITAT Delhi held that as conditions prescribed in exception to section 9(1)(vii)(b) stand fulfilled, it cannot be taxed as FTS. Further, the source for making or earning any income of the payer of fee for technical services, in the present case, is outside India, and therefore not taxable in India.
Calcutta High Court held that the provisions of old regime of Section 148 of the Income Tax Act (including TOLA) cannot be applied to new regime applicable from 01.04.2021. Accordingly, impugned notices quashed being barred by limitation.
Delhi High Court finds Section 148 notice flawed due to lack of non-disclosure allegations; declares Section 147 jurisdiction assumption invalid.
Explore the Jharkhand High Court judgment limiting tax reassessment period for concealed income below 50 lakh. Detailed analysis of Sevensea Vincom Pvt Ltd vs PCIT case.
Explore the ITAT Delhi ruling on Devi Dayal Vs DCIT regarding taxation of salary earned by a non-resident outside India. Detailed analysis and conclusion provided.
ITAT Upholds Reassessment on Accommodation Entry Info from Investigation Wings & affirms Addition u/s 68 Due to Lack of Credibility Evidence in Share Subscription
NCLT Hyderabad held that the provisions of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) override the provisions of the State enacted law, such as, Andhra Pradesh Revenue Recovery Act, 1864.
Delhi ITAT’s landmark ruling in Sarika Bindal vs. ITO establishes that capital gains from share sales cannot be deemed sham, safeguarding taxpayer rights.
Bombay High Court ruled AO can’t reopen assessment due to oversight. Emkay Global Financial Services Limited Vs ACIT details.
