Income Tax : The article explains remedies available after adverse tax orders under scrutiny and reassessment. The key takeaway is that choosin...
Income Tax : The Court clarified that mere pendency of information exchange requests under DTAA cannot justify continuing a Look Out Circular. ...
Income Tax : A surge in Section 143(2) notices was triggered by the June 2025 limitation deadline. This explains why cases were picked and how ...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that penalty under Section 271A cannot be levied merely because books were rejected and income was estimated. S...
Income Tax : The ITAT held that an assessment completed before receiving the DVO report under section 50C(2) is invalid. All additions and disa...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : It has been observed that in many cases an assessee may wish to make a claim which was not made in the return of income filed unde...
Income Tax : We have attached a file in excel format. The file contains the format of various details which normally assessing officer asks As...
Income Tax : Tribunal observed that the Assessing Officer failed to establish any mismatch in stock, sales, or accounting records before making...
Income Tax : ITAT Hyderabad held that constituent members of a JV or Consortium can claim deduction under Section 80IA(4) when they actually ex...
Income Tax : The Tribunal found that full payment, TDS deduction, and transfer of possession established completion of the transaction for capi...
Income Tax : ITAT Rajkot held that cash deposits made during demonetization were fully supported by audited books of account, cash books, and b...
Income Tax : The Hyderabad ITAT held that purchases cannot be treated as bogus merely because the supplier failed to respond to a notice under ...
Income Tax : Instruction No.1/2015 Clarification regarding applicability of section 143(1D) of the Income-tax Act, 1961- Vide Finance Act, 2012...
ITAT Chennai deletes Rs. 16.8 lakhs addition, finding no evidence to prove properties sold by taxpayer were agricultural land in D. Ramagopal Vs ACIT case.
Discover the ITAT Delhi ruling in Anurag Singh vs. ITO, where it was decided that AO cannot rectify issues already settled by CIT(A). Full case analysis and implications.
Discover how the ITAT Delhi deleted the addition u/s 69 in Vipul Gupta vs DCIT, highlighting the significance of evidence and agreements in tax assessments.
Learn about the Chennai ITAT ruling in Conferencecall Services India Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT, where a final assessment made after one month of DRP directions was declared time-barred.
Devki Nandan Maheshwari vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) case: Exploring how cash deposits in lender’s bank account were accepted as explained sources, justifying an unsecured loan under Section 68 of Income Tax Act.
Section 54F amendment restricting exemption to one residential house was prospective, applying only from April 1, 2015 and Violation of section 269SS of the IT Act, if any, would call for a separate penalty under section 271D, not an addition under section 68.
Himachal Pradesh High Court rejects appeal by PCIT against Milestone Gears Pvt Ltd citing 224 days delay in refiling under Section 80IC of the IT Act.
Assessing Officer has nowhere determined as to how Section 194C is applicable on payments made by assessee. Unless a charge is being determined, disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) cannot be made.
Bombay High Court deems CBDT’s refusal to condone delay in filing revised ITR by CG Power post-NCLT order unreasonable. Detailed analysis of the case.
Bombay High Court rules IT search under Section 132 invalid if authorization is based on irrelevant and unrelated material. Detailed case analysis inside.
