Income Tax : The article explains remedies available after adverse tax orders under scrutiny and reassessment. The key takeaway is that choosin...
Income Tax : The Court clarified that mere pendency of information exchange requests under DTAA cannot justify continuing a Look Out Circular. ...
Income Tax : A surge in Section 143(2) notices was triggered by the June 2025 limitation deadline. This explains why cases were picked and how ...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that penalty under Section 271A cannot be levied merely because books were rejected and income was estimated. S...
Income Tax : The ITAT held that an assessment completed before receiving the DVO report under section 50C(2) is invalid. All additions and disa...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : It has been observed that in many cases an assessee may wish to make a claim which was not made in the return of income filed unde...
Income Tax : We have attached a file in excel format. The file contains the format of various details which normally assessing officer asks As...
Income Tax : Tribunal observed that the Assessing Officer failed to establish any mismatch in stock, sales, or accounting records before making...
Income Tax : ITAT Hyderabad held that constituent members of a JV or Consortium can claim deduction under Section 80IA(4) when they actually ex...
Income Tax : The Tribunal found that full payment, TDS deduction, and transfer of possession established completion of the transaction for capi...
Income Tax : ITAT Rajkot held that cash deposits made during demonetization were fully supported by audited books of account, cash books, and b...
Income Tax : The Hyderabad ITAT held that purchases cannot be treated as bogus merely because the supplier failed to respond to a notice under ...
Income Tax : Instruction No.1/2015 Clarification regarding applicability of section 143(1D) of the Income-tax Act, 1961- Vide Finance Act, 2012...
ITAT Mumbai upholds Bytescale Technologies’ deduction for trading activity under Section 10AA for AY 2018-19; foreign tax credit also approved
In PCIT Vs Mahabir Jute Mills Lts., the Allahabad High Court ruled that if books of accounts are not objected to, the AO cannot disturb gross profit rates. Detailed analysis here.
Delhi High Court ruling: Assessing Officer cannot assume jurisdiction under Section 147 of Income Tax Act without proper grounds. Detailed analysis and judgment.
Discover why ITAT Jodhpur ruled that cash deposits made by a 77-year-old assesse during demonetization couldn’t be added under section 68 of the Income Tax Act.
Understand the grounds of appeal in the case against the final assessment order under the Income Tax Act, 1961, for AY 2017-18, involving taxability of employee cost reimbursements and more.
Learn about the ITAT Kolkata ruling in Manohar Dealcom vs ITO, addressing jurisdiction issues and the applicability of Section 69 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Bangalore allows Section 54F deduction for all apartment units from JDA, dismissing Revenue’s appeal. Learn about the significant tax ruling.
In the case of Rajni Dua Vs ACIT, ITAT Delhi orders reassessment due to discrepancies in property ownership and leasehold rights. Detailed analysis provided.
ITAT Delhi rules non-resident’s salary for services rendered abroad not taxable in India, providing significant relief under India-Australia DTAA.
ITAT Kolkata rules in favor of Sati Promoters Pvt. Ltd., deleting Rs. 1.98 Cr Section 68 addition due to AO’s reliance on non-production of subscribing company directors.
