Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : Understand the statutory time limits for issuing income-tax notices and completing assessments under the Income-tax Act. The guide...
Income Tax : Learn the updated provisions governing rectification, assessments, reassessments, and appeals under the Income-tax Act. This guide...
Income Tax : Learn how different types of income tax assessments are conducted under the Income-tax Act. The FAQs explain assessment procedures...
Income Tax : Section 154 permits rectification of mistakes apparent from the record in assessment orders, intimations, and TDS/TCS processing s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : It has been observed that in many cases an assessee may wish to make a claim which was not made in the return of income filed unde...
Income Tax : We have attached a file in excel format. The file contains the format of various details which normally assessing officer asks As...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held that additions made in an intimation under Section 143(1) cannot be disputed in an appeal against a scrutiny a...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held legal services are not FTS under Section 9(1)(vii) and directed partner-wise DTAA examination. FTS addition was de...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai deleted a Section 69 addition after finding documentary evidence established joint ownership, source of funds, and ear...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai quashed reassessment after finding no Section 143(2) notice and that the AO issued a final order disguised as a draft ...
Income Tax : ITAT Surat held that delayed filing of Form 10B is a procedural lapse and remanded the matter after directing the AO to consider t...
Income Tax : Instruction No.1/2015 Clarification regarding applicability of section 143(1D) of the Income-tax Act, 1961- Vide Finance Act, 2012...
The ITAT Kolkata deleted a double addition of Rs. 3.43 Cr, an ad-hoc expense disallowance, and a notional interest addition, finding the additions to be without legal basis.
The ITAT Kolkata upheld the deletion of a Rs. 20.25 Cr addition, confirming that unsecured loans received through banking channels were genuine after the lenders’ identities and creditworthiness were verified through their completed assessments.
The ITAT Kolkata has quashed a reassessment notice and a subsequent Rs. 7.03 Cr addition, ruling that once a Section 263 revision proceeding is dropped, a Section 147 reassessment on the same issue cannot be initiated.
ITAT Raipur rules that mechanical or “rubber-stamp” approvals under Section 153D are invalid, requiring the approving authority to apply independent mind and provide case-specific reasoning.
ITAT Kolkata rules that a PCIT cannot initiate a Section 263 revision based solely on an AO’s proposal without independent satisfaction, quashing the revisionary order.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that CIT(A)-NFAC has dismissed the appeal without rendering any findings on the merits of the case, which is against the principles of natural justice. Accordingly, order of CIT(A)-NFAC is set aside, and matter is restored to the file of CIT(A)-TP for fresh adjudication on merits.
ITAT Mumbai held that the Explanation to section 14A of the Income Tax Act inserted by the Finance Act, 2022 is prospective in nature and cannot be applied to assessment years preceding the amendment. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed.
ITAT Delhi held that the benefit of working capital adjustment while computing the ALP has also not been borne in mind hence matter restored to the file of TPO/ AO for fresh determination in accordance with law.
Bombay High Court held that if municipal rateable value doesn’t depict correct annual value, AO can make independent enquiry under section 23(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act and determine the sum which the property is reasonably expected to fetch for purpose of determining annual value u/s. 22.
The Madras High Court has dismissed an appeal by the Income Tax Department, affirming the quashing of reassessment proceedings against Siva Ventures Ltd. due to full disclosure by the assessee.
